What exactly is Entrapment which is It Legal in Singapore?

Entrapment occurs when a party is instigated or pressured by An additional person into committing an offence which he / she wouldn't have dedicated or else. This other human being is usually focusing on his very own or acting for that authorities.

Entrapment takes place a great deal in movies and tv displays. A common trope is usually a law enforcement officer pretending to get a drug addict. He then leads to A further man or woman to obtain drugs on his behalf. That person would then be billed with drug trafficking.

As offered in the example earlier mentioned, entrapment needs an element of instigation. That may be triggering An additional to dedicate an offence by way of intentional misrepresentation or concealment of details. It is not only offering another occasion with the opportunity to dedicate an offence.

An example of providing a possibility will be if the law enforcement officer in the example higher than had instead procured the medicine in the drug supplier himself. He would then only be delivering an opportunity for that drug vendor to dedicate a drug trafficking offence. Listed here, there is no misrepresentation or concealment as being the police officer will not be bound to inform the drug trafficker that he's a police officer.

This information will talk about:

Whether proof obtained from entrapment is authorized in Singapore
Whether entrapment authorized in Singapore
Whether or not entrapment may be used as being a mitigating component or defence in an accused’s circumstance
Is Evidence Attained From Entrapment Legal in Singapore?
Of course, obtaining proof via entrapment is authorized in Singapore and this kind of proof is admissible, or may be approved, from the court docket if it is appropriate to the case.

Even so, the court can deny these kinds of proof In the event the hurt that it leads to to your events in the situation is higher than its usefulness in proving that scenario. This principle also applies to illegally attained evidence.

Illegally attained evidence is proof that is unlawfully or improperly acquired.

An illustration of illegally acquired proof is a stolen document proving A further celebration’s tax fraud. When the person who stole the doc may very well be guilty of theft, that doc would still be admissible as evidence versus that other celebration in a very separate situation of tax fraud. Entrapment is an element of this wider classification of illegally obtained evidence. Having said that, illegally obtained evidence differs from entrapment because it lacks that factor of instigation.

Inspite of these variations, the Singapore courtroom has resolved not to treat entrapment or illegally received proof in a different way In relation to admissibility. Hence, regardless of whether a certain bit of evidence had been received illegally or through entrapment, this evidence can however be admitted As long as it's appropriate, plus more helpful than hazardous.

The basic principle that all evidence is permitted whether it is applicable to the case also applies regardless of whether the proof attained by entrapment were performed by A non-public organisation or because of the state.

The key distinction between non-public and state entrapment will be the social gathering conducting the entrapment. In non-public entrapment, the party conducting the entrapment isn't acting for that point out, or the government.

For instance, a scenario of A personal Affiliation attempting to weed out copyright infringement by instigating An additional social gathering to dedicate program piracy could be deemed personal entrapment. In distinction, Top criminal lawyer point out entrapment involves somebody acting to the point out, ordinarily a law enforcement officer.

In each private and condition entrapment, there isn't a distinction within their realistic outcome. The fundamental issue is whether the conduct in the entrapping functions was illegal.

Is Entrapment Lawful in Singapore?
Though proof obtained via entrapment is admissible in our courts, the act of entrapment by itself could possibly be unlawful If your illegal perform of your party conducting the entrapment was egregious. If so, the one that abetted the entrapped human being into committing an offence may themselves also be discovered guilty in the offence of abetting Yet another particular person to dedicate an offence.

An illustration of egregiously illegal carry out might be inducing anyone with none prison tendencies into committing a significant offence.

For example, in cases of state entrapment where a law enforcement officer pretends to be interested in buying medication to entrap drug dealers into promoting medication, the officer would usually not be prosecuted for attempting to acquire medicines (which can be normally an unlawful act). It's because the officer was advertising and marketing a socially fascinating objective in the form of curbing the drug trade.

If regulation enforcement officers were being prosecuted For each and every drug trafficker they correctly entrap, they might be hampered from proficiently undertaking their obligations.

On the other hand, If your legislation enforcement officer’s unlawful carry out was egregious, including if they had coerced a person who has no interest in drugs into buying them, the point out will likely not condone that conduct and can prosecute the officer. Failure to take action could be unconstitutional since it would not be treating law enforcement officers, and those arrested for a similar offence, Similarly.

Can Entrapment be Utilised being a Mitigating Element or Defence in an Accused’s Case?
In Singapore, entrapment is not a defence. This is due to the fault ingredient and Bodily act on the offence might have been committed in most cases. It doesn't subject the offender had been instigated to do so.

Based on the facts of the situation on the other hand, it might be achievable for entrapment to become considered a mitigating variable through sentencing. The courtroom will look at the details to ascertain the impression (if any) the entrapment experienced within the culpability, or guilt, of the offender.

Should the entrapment experienced only presented an opportunity for an accused to commit the criminal offense, then it might have no mitigating worth. By way of example, if an undercover officer just expressed curiosity in underage sex as well as offender subsequently organized for an overseas trip partaking in underage intercourse tourism, the entrapment would not have any mitigating value.

This is due to the undercover officer just offered an opportunity to dedicate the criminal offense and also the offender might have fully commited the crime regardless. Having said that, in conditions exactly where an offender with no felony tendencies was induced to commit a crime he / she would not have committed, the entrapment could possibly have some mitigating worth.



If you believe you are actually entrapped into committing an offence, an attorney can advise you whether or not the carry out from the entrapment was egregiously illegal, or no matter whether it might help minimize your sentence. In that case, they will elevate these arguments in court docket on the behalf to test and obtain the very best consequence for yourself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *